Whilst Mick is a good commentator and has a lot of passion for the game, I can't believe some of the stuff I'm reading on this thread on some of the earlier pages.

Whilst I don't know, and by the looks of it none of us knows why Mick is no longer associated with BCB - if and I mean IF he was removed from duty then can you really blame them given his past record? He's a liability who caused a lot of grief that simply didn't need to be caused during the Admin period.

IF he has been removed, I hope he learns to not act like a douchebag, to keep quiet and not to speculate. Report the facts, to which AFAIK, Mick never had any.

I hope that isn't the reason he's no longer there - but seriously guys, come on, I'd have expected the boot if I'd have caused as much grief earlier in the season, as I'm sure you would too.

Now, like I said, he always did a good job commentating. Good luck in your future endeavours Mick, all the best, and I hope you have a long successful career. Just remember everything you've learnt so far, and learn from any mistakes.

Well there are a few names that derive from Edward, but I assume he decided he preferred 'Ted' - which is the reason why everyone apart from the BCB commentator calls him 'Ted'

Yeah just realised we had Ted and not Jay. Confused myself!

Official Super League account has just tweeted the teams for Wire/Widnes. They've called him Ed too. Probably because it's his name.
He goes by "Teddy" on his own twitter account, something I've not seen any media outlet refer to him as. Seems fairly clear he's not all that bothered about which shortened version he uses. Except I expect he doesn't like being called Jay (which incidentally is short for James...). Point remains, it was hardly something to pick the commentator up about.