no doubt the facks board were happy when we were deducted £1m in funding leading into a promotion/relegation battle that did for us. IF we stay up due to change of structure then its payback for that deduction; sorting out the RFL's fixture problem and paying for the pleasure of doing so; and being deducted 14 points for the pleasure of sorting out the RFL's summer bashed problem.
973_1515165968.gifLast edited by Ferocious Aardvark on stardate Jun 26, 3013 11:27 am, edited 48,562,867,458,300,023 times in total:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_973.gif
ROFL at the trolls who seem to think *IF* the clubs voted to increase the division size, this *CAN ONLY BE* because every club chairman is a secret Bradford placeman!
The meeting isn't about fsckin Bradford FFS!!
And the irony is that The Club Most Screwed title is currently held by the new BB outfit which was forced to play in this division, with no money and under severe penaties, which was deemed to be the best thing for all other clubs and plainly the worst thing for the new BB. So anyone who still claims stuff is done to "favour" BB is certifiably insane. The clubs in such meetings vote to do what is in their own best interests. And so they should. Whether that co-incides with other club's interests or not is purely incidental.
There's someone on the Halifax board trying to start a thread about Stevo being biased towards Bradford in commentary against Fax in 1998. That's not good enough...
Disclaimer: the person in question only has 139 posts, may well be a parody account, and nobody else has replied. BUT THERE'S NO SMOKE WITHOUT FIRE...
Quote: Block5Bull "There's someone on the Halifax board trying to start a thread about Stevo being biased towards Bradford in commentary against Fax in 1998. That's not good enough...
Disclaimer
If they said Nigel Wood was biased towards the Bulls that might be more believable
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
