I dunno, a lot of big boys there in the pack! Mullally, Kaufusi and Fakir! Sutcliffe only played 4 games but saying that we had Gaskell and Gale in the halves. That there should have been a top 6 halfback pairing.

The improvement under Lowes lasted for me until the £1 million match. After that game it went downhill but he did well over the course of a year and a half.

I do think we will narrowly lose unless we can get a good lead at halftime. I think we lack something in attack. I'm hoping Pryce brings that but we didn't look threatening against a good Hudds team. Defence was good though!

Forced to laugh at T&A, "Bulls must cut out errors", there goes that song again!

Championship 1 is also looking really competitive. I would reserve Toronto for first place and a few teams in the fight for the other spot.

We play toronto at home early on so we will see, if we keep momentum I see no reason we can't give them a close game. I suspect next year we have a greater chance of going up, unless bradford come down then we are probably scrapping for second spot again!

If Toronto prove Succesful and we manage to stay FT and in Championship, then it would mean another FT side in the Championship. In terms of quality levels does that mean the RFL are getting it right?

Would love to see a all FT Championship.

Bulls
KR
Toronto
Tolouse
London

Shame Sheffield couldn't make it count, and manage to stay FT.

Does anybody like the idea of reducing SL to 10 FT sides and having a Championship of 10 FT sides?

Competition levels I feel would be better.

It doesn't work. Not enough games. Ideally it needs two divisions of 16 but there isn't enough quality of players or backers with loadsa money.

Anybody know what the gate receipts were for the Keighley match (and how much of them Bulls got (after the VAT was put to one side ))?