|
FORUMS > Bradford Bulls > Do you want a rich owner or not? |
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 1149 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2012 | 13 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2019 | Nov 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
| I guess from the Sugar Daddy point of view if you put in the millions and a few men and their dogs turn up, it is very different from splashing the cash then getting 10,000 fans through the gate to limit the cash drain.
But the Bulls never attracted a big money backer when we were bringing home the trophies and gates over 10k, so the chances of finding one after an embarrassing weekend in Cumbria must be very low.
| | |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 28357 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
May 2024 | Oct 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
973_1515165968.gif Last edited by Ferocious Aardvark on stardate Jun 26, 3013 11:27 am, edited 48,562,867,458,300,023 times in total:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_973.gif |
|
| My fundamental objection to it was that a team with a million or so less to play with, playing all season at a lower level, could not hope to compete with a SL team in the intensity of the MPG.
I know that at least in theory the salary cap restriction has now gone - but in practice unless someone puts in the difference between SL income and Championship income, there remains a huge imbalance.
If a Championship team is good enough to finish top of its pile then the time has come for at least one automatic promotion spot. Playoffs for a potential second if you like, but the Championship winner deserves to go up, and SL bottom to go down, full stop.
During the time we've had this system the standard of the Championship has markedly increased but it isn't SL. The top C. team deserves to go up, and then have the chance to prepare and upgrade for a crack at SL. The old objection, that they would be doomed to "yoyo" and hopelessly uncompetitive at SL level has been seriously holed by the exploits of Leigh, but even if they were, the performances of some SL clubs have not been awe-inspiring and the jeopardy of a banker relegation spot might perk that league up.
| | |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 1795 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2011 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Apr 2021 | Jan 2021 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
54218_1349939535.jpg :d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_54218.jpg |
|
| One of the original objectives of this system was to bridge the massive gap that existed between the 2 leagues after so many years of the franchise system. That is happening and so the strategy is working. The next step in the strategy surely is to go to 1U1D, perhaps if a second Championship club wins automatic promotion in the 8's in the next season or so. The biggest issue for me with the current system and this applies to Mcbbbs relegation topic too, is that the standard of refereeing needs to be improved to provide a level playing field between the 2 leagues.
| | |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 4526 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Oct 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
13619.gif :13619.gif |
|
| Quote: Ferocious Aardvark "
I know that at least in theory the salary cap restriction has now gone - but in practice unless someone puts in the difference between SL income and Championship income, there remains a huge imbalance.
If a Championship team is good enough to finish top of its pile then the time has come for at least one automatic promotion spot. Playoffs for a potential second if you like, but the Championship winner deserves to go up, and SL bottom to go down, full stop.
During the time we've had this system the standard of the Championship has markedly increased but it isn't SL. The top C. team deserves to go up, and then have the chance to prepare and upgrade for a crack at SL. The old objection, that they would be doomed to "yoyo" and hopelessly uncompetitive at SL level has been seriously holed by the exploits of Leigh, but even if they were, the performances of some SL clubs have not been awe-inspiring and the jeopardy of a banker relegation spot might perk that league up.'"
Whilst you are correct in a perfect worl in the real world a team can't survive in SL without somebody putting a huge wedge in.
| | | |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Moderator | 10969 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2023 | Jun 2022 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
1271.jpg Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect.
Mark Twain
Build Bridges NOT Walls:1271.jpg |
Moderator
|
| Quote: rugbyreddog "Whilst you are correct in a perfect worl in the real world a team can't survive in SL without somebody putting a huge wedge in.'"
That is looking increasingly to be the case, at least if you want to be a proper player in the league and not just another Wakey.
The Leigh experience has shown that is actually possible, with solid, and significant, financial backing. It maybe also crystallises in the mind whether or not we'd really [iwant[/i to go up without something similar?
Leigh still have to make it stick, of course, and not come straight back down, and for the good of RL as a whole we have to hope they can. It does also, as mentioned above, lead to the conclusion that straight P&R would work,[i if all[/i clubs at our level were generally better funded.
| | |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 28357 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
May 2024 | Oct 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
973_1515165968.gif Last edited by Ferocious Aardvark on stardate Jun 26, 3013 11:27 am, edited 48,562,867,458,300,023 times in total:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_973.gif |
|
| Quote: rugbyreddog "Whilst you are correct in a perfect world in the real world a team can't survive in SL without somebody putting a huge wedge in.'"
Well, you can, at the moment, because of the smoke and mirrors "promotion" system. Leigh have done the magnificent this year, sure, but even so, 11 out of 12 SL clubs have survived, and I think until we have automatic promotion all 12 will invariably survive even if it ends up being by winning the MPG.
| | |
| |
|
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
Copyright 1999 - 2024 RLFANS.COM
You must be 18+ to gamble, for more information and for help with gambling issues see https://www.begambleaware.org/.
Please Support RLFANS.COM
3.7568359375:5
|
|
POSTS | ONLINE | REGISTRATIONS | RECORD | 19.65M | 1,953 | 80,155 | 14,103 |
| LOGIN HERE or REGISTER for more features!.
When you register you get access to the live match scores, live match chat and you can post in the discussions on the forums.
|
RLFANS Match Centre
Mens Betfred Super League XXVIII ROUND : 1 | | PLD | F | A | DIFF | PTS |
Wigan |
29 |
768 |
338 |
430 |
48 |
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
Hull KR |
29 |
731 |
344 |
387 |
44 |
Warrington |
29 |
769 |
351 |
418 |
42 |
Leigh |
29 |
580 |
442 |
138 |
33 |
Salford |
28 |
556 |
561 |
-5 |
32 |
St.Helens |
28 |
618 |
411 |
207 |
30 |
|
Catalans |
27 |
475 |
427 |
48 |
30 |
Leeds |
27 |
530 |
488 |
42 |
28 |
Huddersfield |
27 |
468 |
658 |
-190 |
20 |
Castleford |
27 |
425 |
735 |
-310 |
15 |
Hull FC |
27 |
328 |
894 |
-566 |
6 |
LondonB |
27 |
317 |
916 |
-599 |
6 |
Betfred Championship 2024 ROUND : 1 | | PLD | F | A | DIFF | PTS |
Wakefield |
27 |
1032 |
275 |
757 |
52 |
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
Toulouse |
26 |
765 |
388 |
377 |
37 |
Bradford |
28 |
723 |
420 |
303 |
36 |
York |
29 |
695 |
501 |
194 |
32 |
Widnes |
27 |
561 |
502 |
59 |
29 |
Featherstone |
27 |
634 |
525 |
109 |
28 |
|
Sheffield |
26 |
626 |
526 |
100 |
28 |
Doncaster |
26 |
498 |
619 |
-121 |
25 |
Halifax |
26 |
509 |
650 |
-141 |
22 |
Batley |
26 |
422 |
591 |
-169 |
22 |
Swinton |
28 |
484 |
676 |
-192 |
20 |
Barrow |
25 |
442 |
720 |
-278 |
19 |
Whitehaven |
25 |
437 |
826 |
-389 |
18 |
Dewsbury |
27 |
348 |
879 |
-531 |
4 |
Hunslet |
1 |
6 |
10 |
-4 |
0 |
|