What I meant there FA (probably not written very well) was that all we or Leigh had to do to get into the £1m game was to finish at the top of our championship league of 4 teams assuming the 4 SL teams will take positions 1-4 which they did and probably should do if all went to plan.
It turned out like two competitions with the top of CH. playing the bottom of the SL.

This year will probably be the same to get that 5th place. Be the top CH club. Once Leigh had imploded we would have had to have been poor not to get into the £1m game.
That is why I don't see it as a massive achievement to get there. Just be better than Leigh. I don't mean to talk down the other two clubs but in reality it should be us or Leigh again. Beat Leigh and the other two and we are there.

That is how I see it. I do agree with your point above about finishing top in the championship as any advantage over Leigh and the bottom SL club is vital and could just be the difference.

That would be interesting. Presumably then we could sue the RFL as our landlords for leasing us premises unfit for purpose?

We haven't sued anybody for absolutely ages

Leigh? Brand new ground? Why wouldn't that fit the bill?

Us & Fax - far from perfect, but both previously SL grounds?! No worse than HKR or Wakey for example....

The stadium rules were to fit with franchising criteria I think. We no longer have franchising so, logically, (I know!) there shouldn't be an RFL stadium requirement anymore....

I assume he means those are the ones that ARE fit, rather than not fit. As they're probably the 3 best grounds in the division.

Yes I did mean that. Sorry.