It's unfair to criticise The Bulls players for lack of desire yesterday. With them being full time they had opportunity to dwell on three games in eight days. The lucky Featherstone players had no time to stress as they had work to go to.

Ahh, of course - that's maybe why I'm not getting full benefit...

That said, la la la blocks out the contradictory voices much better. I think maybe 'wibble' is for when I present at the doctor hoping to get signed off?

Don't know where you get your info from as A. Derek was not searching for a freebie he was more than happy to pay and stand on the terraces with other fans. B. He did not turn up and get sent away by your security staff. he stayed home. C. You need to look closer to home for foul mouthed buffoons, did your team not also get reprimanded for bringing game into disrepute and inciting Mr Beaumont. Fact

You are fantasising. Fact. Absolutely nowhere has anyone other than derek claimed his moronic behaviour was because he was 'incited'. If you can find a quote from the rfl that backs up your claim post it.

I thought there was a statement posted on the Leigh clubs official Facebook page? Much like anything I doubt anyone has actually read it for themselves are just piling in on the bants.

Well put Pp. I always find it strange that the guilty ones are the "council for the defence" in their stance over an incident.
I know for a fact that the said Mr B started the incitement of our Players who were sat in the stand ie they weren't chosen to play but were either on the injury list or part of the non chosen squad.
Our reprimand as we all know was due to ill chosen comments in the tunnel about the performance of the official.
Mr B was fined £2000 we were warned about comments that were predjudicial to the game, or some such jargonise.
The case rests, more in our favour than theirs.
Their points difference is not only on the field of play, but leads the SL and Championship? I refer to sin binnings etc., at, I believe is now somewhere in the region of 34...doesn't make for the angelic badly done to syndrome, does it???