We said exactly the same today. A rubbish 20 mins, followed by a brilliant 10 mins; then the pattern repeated. Then a really good last 15 mins.

Pitts has shown a good offload so far but I see what you mean.

My reservation is that Addy doesn't provide enough creativity to outweigh his lack of size taking the ball up or his shoulder grabbing defence.

I do think he's in front of Chev tho.

I'd probably have some of the Scholarship lads in front of Chev.

For a back rower, his defence is terrible. Drops off so many tackles.

I really like Pitts and wouldn't complain were he at 13 but I think Addy's carry is pretty decent and his workrate is excellent, tons of metres, carries tackles.

His defence has always been the main concern but I've given him the benefit of the doubt as he's played in some truly embarrassing teams, often with 1 and rarely, if ever with 4 props.

Except we've scored 278 points, only Leigh have scored more and no other team has reached the 200 mark. So despite hardly being the ultimate machine, we can't be that easy to predict/marshall

I do agree we could be a lot better, Siejka's light remains buried deep under his bushel. Maybe it's not much of a light. I'm praying it's just an oversized bushel.

Given that Harry is what he is ( and Lowes seems to like his defence) what would you do? A bit more craft and another option at 13, or a bit more size, physicality from Pitts/Ferguson?