sportinglife have it the same, Bradford end was overflowing and a large percentage of the main stand was ours aswell

Thanks for the consideration you have shown in making that comment..Very much appreciated.

[youtubeJNvQezv37xI[/youtube

Go on, then.


No, you said you'd be happy to explain in simpler terms how one of us must be wrong, and we are waiting with bated breath for your explanation. In simpler terms.

I am also struggling a bit with the complexity of this advice, and whilst you're kindly offering to give free English comprehension masterclasses for those of us not blessed with your mastery of expression, could you just help me with a couple of points?

1. Despite me having ribbed you rather obviously about your previous grocer's apostrophe, you s'eem to have s'lipped another one in. This seems unfortunate, for a self-proclaimed master of comprehension, so I assume it has some hidden import that us mere mortals cannot grasp, and not a case of you being barely literate, but could you jus't clear it up for us'?

2. There's an apparent flaw in your chosen metaphor: if Hamster Chops is analagous to an infant in a pram, who has thrown his toys out, then how could said infant reach those toys, in order to be able to pick them up? I mean, it doesn't immediately make sense. Surely, it would be the person looking after the infant who would have the task of toy retrieval and return, as that would be an impossibility for the infant?

That makes part 2 of what you posted irrelevant..But keep the good work up..

I think this thread has run its course now. Thanks for playing.