Quote: Ferocious Aardvark "When have I ever said any such thing? You do love your lies. Why do I need to ask him about the concert? WTF has that to do with anything now?
No. It is not a case of "belief". I have been reliably informed that OK was allowed to vote approx. £1m at the creditors' meeting and on the basis of that it seems very clear the evidence he produced must have been directly responsible for the upgrade. You of course are in denial about the creditors meeting.
So he says. I have never said I "Believe" him but I certainly see no reason to disbelieve him, it is certainly perfectly possible. As has been explained in detail to you but as normal you've simply ignored.
It is unfathomably stupid of you to keep flogging your dead horse. Anyone with a brain - seeing it means so much to you - could and of course would have very easily checked it out.
I can, though. So could you if you checked it for yourself.
I have already stated that no hearing date has been fixed yet. As normal you just weren't accepting incoming.
I can. And of course, many times, I have. You could too, if you checked it for yourself.
I bet you also don't believe man landed on the Moon, and that the Earth is flat. If your irrational beliefs make you happy then great. I can lead an ass to water, but I can't make it drink.'"
Whitcut is a two bit shyster. He's the only person who has claimed Khan put £1m in. His business history & his actions whilst in charge at Ok Bulls show him to be a credibility free individual, but you believe what he has to say. Reliably informed, by who? There is nothing to support your claim.
There is no court case. So 6 months on from the stat demand, there is still no hearing date, you can't say which solicitors are involved, or which parties. If the number you say is the case number was genuine, you would be able to say who the parties were, who the solicitors are and where the case was to be heard. You can't.
Walter Mitty has nothing on you.