Quote: bullinenemyland "I've heard this quite a lot, but I personally think Foster is a better option than both those. His main failing is that he's very poor under the high ball which teams tend to try to exploit.
That said, he's not been found missing nearly as much as Henry has in the games he's played.
My issue with O Brien is that he just cannot tackle someone on his own, he clings on for dear life and then just hopes someone will come in and finish it off. Just not good enough at this level.'"
I think we did perfectly fine without Foster last week. He is absolutely awful in defence and not much of a option at FB, like you say he is no good under the high ball. Gales goal kicking didn't look too bad either so I'm not worried about that.