Quote: Adeybull "I await the Dweebtroll posting the review panel's detailed terms of reference on here. So we can see if there is any suggestion that they are being guided towards an RFL-leaning decision, as the Dweebtroll seems to be wanting people to suppose? Since it seems to be so keen on people providing documentary evidence in support of their assertions, I feel sure its failure to do so on its own account must be a simple oversight?
I am curious why it would anyway want people to think that the panel is not impartial? And why it would seek to impugn the professional integrity of the qualified professionals who sit on the panel, with its implication of lack of impartiality?
I'm anyway a bit surprised that it is still making such a fool and a nuisance of itself on here. It seems to have found a new place to annoy all and sundry - that lovely Bulls-friendly place, the VT. Last time I looked, it was deriding and insulting folk on there who disagreed with it. Demonstrating excellent troll credentials, in fact. Although given my experiences with some of the lovely folk on there, there may be a strong argument that it is performing a public service.'"
I merely provided the information that Pinsent Mason are contracted legal advisers to the RFL since 2005. That it is two of their partners who are on the independent appeal panel looking into the legitimacy of the punishment handed down by the RFL is not something I have commented on.
You never did come back about the capacity in which you had access to OK Bulls accounts, or the NDA you claim you had to sign?
I wonder if Ryan Whitcut has been around Valley parade lately?