|
|
 |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 15 | Bradford Bulls |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2010 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2017 | Jul 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| With all the sh=ite coming out on the forum at the moment can this be renamed Touching Cloth
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 4284 | Wakefield Trinity |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Ferocious Aardvark="Ferocious Aardvark"The quote was from MM, not me. Is he lying?
As you know the clubs often seek advances from the RFL and these are often provided, without publicity. As you know, there are obvious reasons why cash flow is extremely tight for whoever would be perating BB just ow, and a request for advances wouldn't be a shock.
But being the type of person you are, you instead refer to this as "getting out the begging bowl". You don't get why you are despised for doing this? Do you know what a "begging bowl" is? It is for gifts. As BB2014 asked for no gifts, YOU are lying. And you can't deny that.
A pointless conflation. The RFL's concern is the integrity of their competition. In the business world companies go into and out of administration all the time, and many creditors, including HMRC, are shafted and can do nothing about it. So the debts are most definitely NOT the debts of the Bradford Bulls, in the sense you state. You are again LYING.
The reason the RFL want them paying is not to make their competition look bad, and NOT because there is any liability. Indeed, the RFL specifically admit that the new club might go on without paying a penny, in SL, and be accepted as such and if that happens they dock points as a sanction.
Liar. What it did not contain was a specific guarantee to fully pay all creditors.
ST yes, but distribution absolutely not. That was announced, and then only in passing, in a press report last week. At which point, BB2014 had not been asked to agree to it (which they would have to do). Still, and to their credit, BB2014 would have gone ahead and run the club, despite all this, but it was the "special measures" thing that broke the camel's back. They felt badly let down and misled over the points, but that was not the key. Nor was paying off creditors, nor the Sky distribution.
FFS, as I keep saying (but you lknow) many clubs seek advances from time to time. And as I keep repeating, the special circumstances of BB2014 right now obviously to anyone have good and exceptional reasons why cashflow is exceedingly tight. It is a perfectly normal way to run a business. Even the biggest companies in the world rely on bank finance borrowings loans and overdrafts. Only a financial dunce would not know that.
But that is exactly what the budget does. Unless you believe they lodged a budget that showed a permanent deficit each year??
Let me ask you two questions:
1. If you were starting up a new business (which BB2014 are) do you think it would be unusual to go to a bank or finance house with your facts figures and business plan, details of how much money you needed to start up and going forward, and ask for a loan? (Clue: the answer is: No - that is how it invariably works)
2. If that business was the Bulls, and you had done a business plan with projections etc., and after you'd done the plan, that plan was scuppered by severe sanctions which meant that not only would the game change dramatically from what you planned as you were almost certain to face relegation, but also that for the foreseeable, you were effectively prevented from running your own business, what would you say?'"
You make statements that suggest you have seen the Bulls business plan submitted to the RFL. Have you or you just making assumptions to suit your POV?
I haven't seen it, but I have seen the statements from the RFL, which state that the new BoD's plan was flawed, that no payments to creditors or HMRC were to be made and that they had no confidence in the bid going forward (which I was amazed at, given they had picked BB2014 as the suceesful bid over Mr Lamb!!).
You are out of order calling me a liar, for using information in the public domain to form my opinion of the situation.
I can see why you feel the term "begging bowl" is emotive - fine, but to one minute say "we are solvent and don't need to sell players, they are ringfenced", to then be outed as asking for a 500k advance (which if given would leave you a hole further down the line), undermines the credibility of BB2014 totally.
It seems clear that BB2014 don't have the capital to buy and run the Bulls.
Have you actually seen the business plan?
| | | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1894 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2008 | 17 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2017 | Nov 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote dboy="dboy"
Why is it reasonable to use tomorrow's money to pay today's bills??? That's no way to run a household, never mind a large business.'"
Clearly you are not an adult as you suggest that it is normal for any household not to have a mortgage, credit cards, overdraft or hire purchase.
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 14302 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2018 | Sep 2015 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Adeybull="Adeybull"Can't you just add an "exterminate" button?'" If you run a poll I'll put it forward after the result.
If you win of course 
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 28357 | Bradford Bulls |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2002 | 24 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
May 2024 | Oct 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote dboy="dboy"You make statements that suggest you have seen the Bulls business plan submitted to the RFL. Have you or you just making assumptions to suit your POV?
I haven't seen it, but I have seen the statements from the RFL, which state that the new BoD's plan was flawed, that no payments to creditors or HMRC were to be made and that they had no confidence in the bid going forward (which I was amazed at, given they had picked BB2014 as the suceesful bid over Mr Lamb!!).
You are out of order calling me a liar, for using information in the public domain to form my opinion of the situation.
I can see why you feel the term "begging bowl" is emotive - fine, but to one minute say "we are solvent and don't need to sell players, they are ringfenced", to then be outed as asking for a 500k advance (which if given would leave you a hole further down the line), undermines the credibility of BB2014 totally.
It seems clear that BB2014 don't have the capital to buy and run the Bulls.
Have you actually seen the business plan?'"
I have never stated that I have seen the business plan. Well, plans, there have been more than one.
You stated an untruth when you said the Bulls were "getting out the begging bowl". It simply has not happened. And seemingly was misleading too. It's not that that's "emotive", it's just not the truth. If you didn't mean to say the Bulls were begging ie for gifts, then you could say so and apologise, instead of crying about being called on it.
You have forgotten that it was not you, but the RFL and the administrator, who had to decide whether or not BB2014 had credibility and whether they had the funds to buy and run Bradford Bulls. The RFL and administrator plainly felt that they did, otherwise their bid (described in terms as "the strongest offer") was accepted. Therefore to reasonable people, it can't be "clear" at all. And many have now asked, including respected journalists, if the Bulls bid/plan really was that bad, why did the RFL until very recently seem to be steering and encouraging the new owners into place? Odd, that.
I also note you have declined to answer either of the 2 questions I posed for you.
| | | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 1149 | Whitehaven |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2012 | 13 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2019 | Nov 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote bobsmyuncle="bobsmyuncle"Clearly you are not an adult as you suggest that it is normal for any household not to have a mortgage, credit cards, overdraft or hire purchase.'"
Of course most households and businesses in this country fund themselves through borrowing of one sort or another, but these are dangerous tools to use if you don't have reasonable certainty you can meet the repayments. As they like to say in business schools "hope is not a strategy"
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 4284 | Wakefield Trinity |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Ferocious Aardvark="Ferocious Aardvark"I have never stated that I have seen the business plan. Well, plans, there have been more than one.
You stated an untruth when you said the Bulls were "getting out the begging bowl". It simply has not happened. And seemingly was misleading too. It's not that that's "emotive", it's just not the truth. If you didn't mean to say the Bulls were begging ie for gifts, then you could say so and apologise, instead of crying about being called on it.
You have forgotten that it was not you, but the RFL and the administrator, who had to decide whether or not BB2014 had credibility and whether they had the funds to buy and run Bradford Bulls. The RFL and administrator plainly felt that they did, otherwise their bid (described in terms as "the strongest offer") was accepted. Therefore to reasonable people, it can't be "clear" at all. And many have now asked, including respected journalists, if the Bulls bid/plan really was that bad, why did the RFL until very recently seem to be steering and encouraging the new owners into place? Odd, that.
I also note you have declined to answer either of the 2 questions I posed for you.'"
Haha. Now it's clear, you have no idea and are just wearing RAB coloured specs!
Despite you calling me and the RFL liars, you are right in stating it is not for me to decide the credibility of BB2014, but the RFL.
The RFL statement is clear in slating the BB2014 bid - it was full of holes.
And I am not crying, far from it, unlike Moore when he spat his dummy.
The most unequivocal and clear, factual information in all this has come from the RFL statement. It damns BB2014 and leaves no doubt about their credibility. None whatsoever.
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 4526 | Bradford Bulls |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jun 2025 | Oct 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote dboy="dboy"I haven't seen it, but I have seen the statements from the RFL, which state that the new BoD's plan was flawed, that no payments to creditors or HMRC were to be made and that they had no confidence in the bid going forward (which I was amazed at, given they had picked BB2014 as the suceesful bid over Mr Lamb!!).
You are out of order calling me a liar, for using information in the public domain to form my opinion of the situation.
'"
The point is that the information is NOT in the public domain. The information is the business plan and nobody on this forum has probably seen it. What is in the public domain is a statement from the RFL saying the plan was flawed and one from MM saying the opposite. What I don't understand is that the RFL board brought in a fabulous sponsorship sponsorship deal with Eddie Stobart that simply resulted in several lorries being painted. They then held a world cup that they couldn't get any sponsorship deal at all. And the brought in a two division competition that turns into three and then god knows what happens. I know which statement I believe.
| | | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1012 | Bradford Bulls |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2008 | 17 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2025 | Jul 2022 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote rugbyreddog="rugbyreddog"The point is that the information is NOT in the public domain. The information is the business plan and nobody on this forum has probably seen it. What is in the public domain is a statement from the RFL saying the plan was flawed and one from MM saying the opposite. What I don't understand is that the RFL board brought in a fabulous sponsorship sponsorship deal with Eddie Stobart that simply resulted in several lorries being painted. They then held a world cup that they couldn't get any sponsorship deal at all. And the brought in a two division competition that turns into three and then god knows what happens. I know which statement I believe.'"
It's quite staggering how the RFL have gone from commercially incompetent and not fit to run the sport to the best judge of a business plan and the source of infallible truths in a week. Did they hire someone new 
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 1625 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2012 | 13 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2019 | Oct 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| So t'Bulls need to cut their cloth for a happy ending?
Got it.
Someone call Barbara [uTaylor[/u-[uBradford[/u.
Ahh, I'm hilarious.
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 3534 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2012 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2020 | Feb 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote dboy="dboy"Haha. Now it's clear, you have no idea and are just wearing RAB coloured specs!
Despite you calling me and the RFL liars, you are right in stating it is not for me to decide the credibility of BB2014, but the RFL.
The RFL statement is clear in slating the BB2014 bid - it was full of holes.
And I am not crying, far from it, unlike Moore when he spat his dummy.
The most unequivocal and clear, factual information in all this has come from the RFL statement. It damns BB2014 and leaves no doubt about their credibility. None whatsoever.'"
I asked you a question couple of days ago and I'm still waiting for your answer.How come you have posted more times on here in last 48 hours than any of us Bulls fans have.I think we all know the answer don't we
| | |
 | |
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
Copyright 1999 - 2025 RLFANS.COM
You must be 18+ to gamble, for more information and for help with gambling issues see https://www.begambleaware.org/.
2025-09-01 21:26:07 LOAD:3.14013671875
|
|
|
POSTS | ONLINE | REGISTRATIONS | RECORD |
---|
19.67M | 1,551 | 80,283 | 14,103 |
|