QFT...
...How long before he edits?

I suppose at least it has not called one of us a Nazi. Unlike that thing from Wakefield.

Oh I dunno, I reckon this one definitely has...potential

Well, maybe like an abstract concept which is known to everyone as "FlexWheeler".


Now there's an abstract concept if ever there was one, if appropriate for a thread.



You should pay more attention at skule. Back to reading Janet and John for you.

I said the very thing back in the depths when this farce was still slightly amusing and I was shouted down as having "made stuff up" when I questioned Ryan's pedigree and business history. To be fair to Adeybull...he was in rehab or somewhere else he couldn't post but the "peevish anteater" and "rrrrodoolfoo24" or whatever where quite damning of me daring to have a pop at young Ryan.

London up next for The Bulls......it'll give you a chance to see how a PROPER club is run

Quote gutterfax="gutterfax" London up next for The Bulls......it'll give you a chance to see how a PROPER club is run '" Oh Yeah ??! www.loverugbyleague.com/news_143 ... -exit.html

Quote gutterfax="gutterfax" London up next for The Bulls......it'll give you a chance to see how a PROPER club is run '" Oh Yeah ??! www.loverugbyleague.com/news_143 ... -exit.html

No, you were shouted down for making stuff up because you were making stuff up.

Apparently, some college student did an analysis of its outpourings. I gather something to do with research into an unfortunate condition know as "keyboard diarrhoea", since the student needed a particularly severe sufferer as a subject.

From the results I saw, apparently:

71% of its outpourings, across all forums, were on the subject of or referenced Bradford in some way. (Apparently, these findings were handed on to another student who was doing a thesis on "obsessive cyber behaviour")

Of that 71%, 6.2% were factually correct or broadly reasonable (yes, I was susprised it was so high, too). 37.4% were made up. 43.6% were nonsense that bore little resemblance to reality, 9.7% appeared to be words in random order or incomplete, and 3.1% were referred to the university's legal team as the student was concerned they contained libel.

The student checked with various Bradford supporters, and apparently a considerable number were already well aware of the facts in the 6.2%, but elected not to shout off on public forums.

I gather the results were not passed on to the subject, due to concern it would only encourage it and make its condition even worse.

By way of a control, ten monkeys (not all from Wakefield) were given tests to determine the corresponding percentages in their decision-making process. sdmittedly, the tests were harder for the monkeys, since they were tested on a wider range of behaviours, not just Bradford obsession, but the results were still deemed to be relevant. Apparently the Monkeys produced 19.6% that was correct

Come on Adey, we all know for a fact that 71.85% of statistics are made up!

I enjoyed reading that alongside your signature.

Except...my post was not part of a debate with the troll. I was merely taking the opportunity of Roofaldo's observations to chuck in some generic derision of the troll while I was here. Just to keep my hand in, naturally. If I ever have the misfortune to be involved in a debate where it has got itself involved, I'll just wheel out the good old facts and logic again, or leave it to FA to grind it into submission.

EDIT: official dispensation for deriding Gutterfux now secured.