So the club announced different numbers at the presentation night, than they did in the e-mail and press release?

Wow that's amateur. I defend the club a lot, and even I can't pretend that's not a bit of a balls up.

No, people wouldn't know to dig out a news article, and there shouldn't be different squads on different pages, and the squad in the article was different from the squad at the shirt presentations.


It turns out (well, so we think) that the wrong shirts were presented, from 16 onwards. It's silly to pretend that's not at least a little embarrassing, and you know it.


Wrong. This is a forum not a private chat, and I was not the only person to think it was embarrassing. And this is your 753rd post about it in the thread, so on any view, you ARE going on and on.

But, I give you permission to have the last word, as I'm totally bored with it now.

Whoever does the website/media releases obviously needs to double check their articles anyway.

If you look at the announcement of the squad for Dewsbury rlhererl, the article says "First-team regulars......are to be joined by youngsters including Adam O'Brien......". Similarly, there's another story interviewing O'Brien saying he's looking forward to the game.

But if you actually read the 20 names announced for the squad, in the same article I've quoted above, Adam O'Brien's name isn't even there.

I think I'll hang on until the opening game and the squad list should be on the programme......, though, of course, it might or might not be the correct one.

Obrien definitely isn't playing. Seems an decision to publish article on website as if he was.

Indeed. rlThis onerl for those who didn't see it. Article put up this morning.



Except that he wasn't. And isn't playing.


All very odd really. Far from the end of the world, but it does look a bit amateur, especially the original article that said he was in the squad, but didn't list him (in the very same article).