You mean evidence beyond the creative book keeping that meant the books were tailored for whoever was to be looking at them?

I think when OK rode in on his white charger he thought more cash would be coming into the club: bigger gates, more sponsorship but learnt very quickly what ownership of a SL club means in reality. It looks like he still imagines he can recover some of his cash tough he seems to realise it cannot come from the club itself but from the people he hoped would take it off his hands. OK might have wanted to get the club out of the hole it had got into but some of his operatives seemef to be equiped with spades to make the hole bigger.

Hope you can prove that, Roofy? You might be on dodgy ground if you can't, and I'd edit it even if I [icould[/i prove it, to be honest.

It seems to have been a case of over expectation, strongly mixed with some naivety and a strong dose of unrealistic projections but suggestions of illegality are not really wise, imo.

Just out of interest it is an actual legal obligation on a company's directors to keep accurate books of account.

Taken from the .gov website.

As a director of a limited company, the law says you must:
try to make the company a success, using your skills, experience and judgment
follow the company’s rules, shown in its articles of association
make decisions for the benefit of the company, not yourself
tell other shareholders if you might personally benefit from a transaction the company makes
keep company records and report changes to Companies House and HM Revenue & Customs
make sure the company’s accounts are a ‘true and fair view’ of the business’ finances
register for Self Assessment and send a personal Self Assessment tax return every year