To be fair its the same in the YEP about Leeds. Not much to say at the moment but the T&A can't resist digging up as much dirt as they can.

How is it clear? Have you some evidence that nobody else has? Are the new owners who have been in situ and running the place these past few weeks just a figment of people's imagination? I think we should be told.

Quote: Ferocious Aardvark "How is it clear? Have you some evidence that nobody else has? Are the new owners who have been in situ and running the place these past few weeks just a figment of people's imagination? I think we should be told.'" I was just going on the club's statement on the club's website dated 20th December 2013 (link below) which includes the followingthe club is still owned by Omar Khan." www.bradfordbulls.co.uk/news__vi ... hip-update

Quote: Ferocious Aardvark "How is it clear? Have you some evidence that nobody else has? Are the new owners who have been in situ and running the place these past few weeks just a figment of people's imagination? I think we should be told.'" I was just going on the club's statement on the club's website dated 20th December 2013 (link below) which includes the followingthe club is still owned by Omar Khan." www.bradfordbulls.co.uk/news__vi ... hip-update

1-0

If I were FA I would be referring to the difference between de facto and de jure. sure the annual return if done today would say OK, but who has been doing the cuts, finding new sponsors, etc etc etc. As it says in some old book, by their deeds ye shall know them.