Well done Omar. Put his money where his mouth is.

Huddersfield are lucky - big money supporter and relatively low gates, but the consistent achievers - Leeds, Wigan and co all have gates averaging 3/4000 more than we do which is giving them a £1m start on us at present even before the Sky shareout. I known its the old chicken and egg problem but we are always going to struggle on average gates around the 8000 level

Having spoken to several fans recently(fans who no longer attend games) the message from them seemed to be the wilderness years under previous regimes seems to have put them off. We are talking about supporters who went to all games and events. They don't support other clubs but are armchair supporters who are still interested in the fortunes of the Club, but we need to get them back. They also mentioned the stupid fixture lists as one of the drawbacks. With a few more winning matches it may encourage more to return.

With regard to getting some more cash in, one thing which seems to have dropped under the radar is the issuing of more shares. It was mentioned at the first forum after Omar took over and at the next one, when they said they were, "still looking at the best way to do it". Well we're now nine or ten months on from that and since then it's not even been mentioned - I wonder why?

Think the problem is we currently operate below breakeven - so if you cannot increase the gate and or sponsorship you have a shortfall every season. So if you have a share issue you help plug the current year's gap - but you cannot do this every year. Now if you said we want to raise £xxx to bring in player A, B and C which then brought more fans through the gate and improved results that would offer a better payback than just filling the cash flow hole and perhaps be more likely to get a better response?

I can't disagree with your logic, but they haven't done that either.

The only caveat I'd offer on that idea is that, unlike when when we did something similar to bring in Deryck Fox, it isn't really transfer fees which need paying these days, as players are rarely 'bought' from other clubs, but on-going contract money and I'm not sure how that would work, since as you say you can't do it every year.

Whatever they choose to do though, and they did say they were thinking of a share issue, they haven't followed it through, not as yet, anyway, and a one off or not, it would be cash in club's coffers but only if they actually get the shares issued...