Because it was labelled 'note to muppets' and you're not a muppet, Broady, you probably skipped over it.

In the case of Elliot Kear's try. Jamie Langley should have known to stay out of it. We make too many sloppy errors to win matches against top sides and that was one of them. Just annoying when minor infringements that have no influence on the passage of play get picked up after seeing monumental clangers like we have this weekend.

Er, but WHAT defender, there was no defender catching the ball. I don't think you've considered the detail I posted, Langley did not infringe either the letter or spirit of the rule (though he bloody well should have known not to get close, but that's another issue)

Langley was offside, get over it.

Seen plenty of similar incidents have a try scrubbed off in Sky games. In that instance it seems quite pedantic when he doesn't interfere with play but the ruling was consistent.

Langley was offside in the same way JJB was offside at Headingley earlier this year. Harsh, but it is what it is.

Sorry missed that last comment

I'm not under it, nor ever was. What do I have to "get over", exactly? Why do people make such totally irrelevant comments? Nobody is disputing that Langley was offside, so I suggest you try reading the OP and see if you have anything to actually add.

The question isn't whether he was offside, it is whether he broke any rule, and I've explained exactly why he didn't. Nobody has yet given a single reason why what I have said is wrong. All I ask is that the laws of the game be applied to the incident, and I argue they clearly weren't.

Murphy was the defender.

You seriously arguing Murphy was "waiting for the ball"? Or "set to catch the kick"? With respect, you cannot be serious.