I think your right - think the point is that Ainscough has been offered a lot less than last year (maybe others players also). Even though tightening belts is in order, players on high wages have left so to offer a lower paid player less when they've sold shirts, campaigned, given their all to save the Bulls must seem like a complete insult as well as the fact that they can't support their family with the money offered.

It's not like we're talking about a player the team needed to get rid of and most would like him re-signed.

Attitude wise I'd say Bateman will be main contender but he doesn't have the physical size to back it up yet.

We still may have the option to get a couple of players during the season, we also are twinned with dewsbury so the option is there if we are struggling for players.

Don't think that will be much of a help TBH. The players who would be available would be those who can't get into dewsburys team. No offence to dewsbury but they aren't likely to be much use at SL level.

Agree with that.

The system does work both ways but was clearly (and rightly, imo) expected to mainly benefit the lower league club and also to provide some games for SL contracted players who weren't getting a game under the new junior and A team set up in SL. Though, if we get our normal luck with injuries it probably won't bring much value to Dews either....

I thought we were Warrington's feeder club?