Quote: roofaldo2 "But his reasoning for why he should be allowed out of his contract is that he's in a similar position to the players at Rangers. Which is simply not the case. They argued that their contract being moved to the newco would be detrimental to them and their careers. That was agreed by the courts as they would be expect to take a paycut, have no European football AND be playing in the bottom tier of Scottish football. Given the Bulls are staying in SL then and being allowed to compete in the CC, which is the only other competition the club is eligible for, Kopout's argument becomes more than a little shakey. So, unless OK Bulls have said something along the lines of "You're only going to be getting half your salary under the newco" there's no real comparison between his situation and that of the players who left Rangers.'"
That's your take on it my friend. All the players had the same option under Tupe but as the other player's contracts were more lucrative and the offers they were given from other clubs were substantially less they were too afraid to resign. He would have left anyway the season after found it unfair to be on half the wage of platy,nas,Sykes,scruton. Move on and don't be so bitter if bulls are such a big club then kopczak is easy to replace.