He won't ever return to bulls purely because of the hassle and gip he's had from bulls fans
And because mr ok bulls never even attempted to re negotiate his poor current contract. He was on very unfavourable money compared to all the other props. Had bulls wanted to thank him for his 9 yr of loyalty they could have revised his contract and given him testimonial which he was entitled to as it would have been his 10th year at bradford next season

To whoever mods this board - I can't edit my post about data protection from my mob. If you are able to remove the quote from broadybull on my behalf I would be grateful, seeing as they have now removed their original message.

Who's this guy?

Kopczak won't be allowed back at the Bulls. You think OK and Cummins would risk losing the dressing room for the sake of Koppy? Probably not. As people have mention on here already a number of players were pi**ed off with Koppy for leaving when he did and probably won't be welcomed with open arms.

I also humbly apologize for my earlier brain fart didnt realise what i posted

Kopczack is a decent prop who if he'dve been five years older would not have got near our first team. He signed every contract he has had, and not being offered revised terms when the current one still has a year to run is not unusual. Had he played and we'd won in the final round, andf subsequently we'd got to the playoffs, I would accept his claim for loyalty, but being in the first team for four seasons doesnto warrant a testemonial, especially when the club, his home town club, needs all the revenue it can get!

A testimonial stands if a player has been at the club 10 years you will find
Every player is entitled to that.

Ps by law he wasn't allowed to play the last game, if he had he would have been accepting his contract being switched over to OK Bulls, if you resigned from your job on the Friday you wouldn't be turning into work Monday would you! No notice is required when you reject a tupe transfer.
Why are people still talking about him? It's old news, we have more pressing matters which lie ahead for the club.

The issue was that he did play, though, knowingly, for the new owners. He hadn't received a letter, true, but as the club had only been sold on the Friday evening that is no surprise. It would be, shall we say, surprising if he didn't know the club had changed hands.


Well, people talk about what they want! Why are YOU talking about him, then?

2012 was his 10th year wasn't it?

IIRC he resigned part way through the season which would make it about 9.75 years.

Don't think 9.75 entitles you to a testimonial.

Didn't it stem from koppy playing for us after the deadline to to TUPE'd and he is now disputing the fact the was ever told, if he wants to go let him then we can move on with signing up players for next season.

I would have assumed every attempt would have been made to inform the players about the ins and out of a possible take over, no one else has had a problem with it.