This is spot on.

Just a few years ago it would have been judged a cracking tackle.

Seen it again today, still don't see it being a dangerous tackle. He landed on his back after trying to break his fall with his elbow. By the letter of the law it is a penalty because of the position his legs get in to, which is just baffling IMO.
But yet Crookes stays on after headbutting and throwing three punches? Should have seen red.

Idiot. Should have used his neck to break his fall. That would teach him for throwing himself into the air.

About as ridiculous as the original posts demanding Seymour's dismissal.

So you no longer believe he landed flat on his back? A point you stated as FACT.

After seeing the pic it's also clear Seymour had hold of his legs, which you said he didn't.

You also now say it was a penalty, where as before there was nothing wrong with it.

Nice backtracking

both players get warnings

A joke & a disgrace. That's it, I'm finished with RL.

Shut the up you silly , he landed flat on his back, after trying to break his fall with his elbow.
Was a great tackle, and one that shouldn't be punished regardless of who attempts it.
So anyway, Crookes' headbutting, what's your view?

Ah right, let's advocate headbutting, nice.

I'm confused now. So did he land on his back or his elbow? So was it a good tackle or one that needed penalising? Did he lift the legs or not?
I think you need to focus on one thing and try and stick to it. It might make life easier for you.
Headbutting should be penalised, as should dangerous tackles. Stamp out the latter and the former will be minimised.