Quote Nothus="Nothus"You can't challenge on decisions like that, and the decision would have stood anyway because it was a clear professional foul from Jeffries.
As I suspected, the captains are only allowed to challenge decisions that can be proven (more or less) by referring to a video replay, such as ball steals in the ruck that may be given as knock ons.
Anything that comes down to the referees interpretation (such as the decision to sin bin BJ) can not be argued. How stupid would it look if someone challenged a call like that and the video ref overruled the ref on the pitch? Ridiculous, and is never going to happen.'"
This.
Jeffries shouldn't have been penalised, but once he was the sin bin was the right decision.
Which would we be appealing? The original decision or the sin binning?