Quote: M@islebugs "Didn't the T and A state the deal was dependent on the RFL selling the lease back to ABC/Bulls? The council would have to agree to this transfer and would insist that as a condition of the original settlement that the Bulls would play there. I can see the sense of the council allowing the Bulls out of the lease but can't see any way they would allow a situation where the Bulls went to VP and Akbars stayed at Odsal. Whoever agreed to that would spend the rest of their life in front of the audit comittee.'"
Spot on IMO. The council could not let a situation happen where Akbars or whoever ended up in sole control of Odsal without it being primarily a Rugby Stadium. Forget the audit committee they would no doubt end up in court under some form of competition rules.
If the lease were to be transferred back to the club it would be on the proviso that it was a Rugby Stadium otherwise the lease would become null and void allowing the Council to find the most advantageous bidder for the land.