Quote: Bulls4Champs "Maybe because he didnt want Peter Hood running something he clearly wasn't upto and wanted a go at trying to secure some money himself? According to reports 800k was on the table and we just needed another 400k, that was 800k more than Peter Hood could manage to secure.'"
Well, you believe that if you want. Personally I reckon if our new board can't between the lot of 'em raise a paltry 400K to save the club they have supposedly come in to save, if they genuinely have a backer/s who will stump up 800K, then that says it all. Anybody could have come in and put out an open-ended begging bowl. Was that really the only plan? "Please give us lots of cash"?
Why should I automatically believe the reports of Coulby yet automatically dismiss the reports of Hood? With respect, you have no idea what Hood would or would not have been able to secure. like the Coulby "investors", they could have been real, or bullters, or mythical.
Anyway, just answer me this: IF there really was "800K on the table", then why, this morning, was the administrator quoted as saying that NOBODY had even come forward that was interested? 800K sounds like somebody that could reasonably be described as fairly interested, surely?