Quote: Bully_Boxer "As fans we all demand that players put their bodies on the line for the club we support albeit for payment. And now some are already wanting to discuss who we should replace him with if he cannot play again.
I personally think this discussion is both premature and a little bit disrespectful. Just my opinion.'"
Personally, I think it's pragmatic.
I, and I'm sure everyone else, hope's Purtell makes a full and speedy recovery. However, if he doesn't and is forced to retire, then it does make next year's retentions a little easier.
At the moment, given Sammut's dispensation and his one year deal, as well as Nas only being signed for a single year, retention for both was not possible as we would only have 1 free quota spot. With the loss of Purtell, we would have space to retain both players which would be a good thing for the club as we'd have Nas' go forward in the pack and Sammut's off the cuff ability in the backs, both which IMO improve the overall balance of the team.
But even then, if we don't keep either of Sammut or Nas, we're back in the market for quota players and have 2 free spots.
I think someone mentioned Shenton earlier in the thread, if he is available then he'd be a good acquisition for the club and I have been told the Bulls have tried to sign him in the past before he left Cas. The only question there is the price tag, he'll be wanting a fair slice of the salary cap no matter where he goes. Young, talented and British is a rare and valuable commodity in the modern game, and unfortunately not always priced in line with their ability due to the enforced quota rules. But that's another argument.