I might have remembered it wrong and if so apologies, but pretty sure that Hood now owns about 16,500 of about 17,000 (give or take, can't remember the exact numbers).

I think there are only about half a dozen shareholders in total now.

there are approx 1000 shareholders. Some only have 2 or 3 shares,some have a significant number but percentage wise caisley is 27%,hood 22%. Think those two are the biggest by some margin. thats why its so difficult attracting anyone to buy the club. they have to deal with several of larger shareholders to get a majority shareholding.

Ah, what I'd been given wasn't directly from Co's House, it was through an Equifax equivalent and that's not taken into account the bulk shareholders list which wasn't with the filed annual return

Should've checked before putting that up, what a dork!

It is interesting that both Hood and Caisley will stand to lose a significant amount if the club goes into administration.

I'm not sure where Hood has made his millions but Mr Caisley will have a bob or 2 to spend.

I'm sure between them, they could raise 50-100k.

If we don't make the total, they stand to lose everything currently invested.

Just back from the Bullbuilder board meeting, which was probably marginally more important than attending to some of the garbage earlier on this thread.

Hood bought most of Colin Tordoff's shares, and now holds around 20%. Caisley is still the largest shareholder with over 27% IIRC, and is the most powerful shareholder since his vote can block a Special Resolution.

Google NAK Corporate World for Peter Hood's business.

Thanks for that, Adey. What else was discussed?

[url=http://www.bullbuilder.co.uk/NewsItem.aspx?GUID=4f6b16ce-ca07-4608-ab22-ffe0a72661fa=#800000This[/url is what we concluded, after several hours of considered debate and deliberation.

Thanks Adey.

Sums up everything well, constructively and reasonably. I think BullBuilder are taking the right course of action.

Clearly, the paramount is the club surviving, which BB recognise.

Yep. Sensible statement, and the right course of action.

Not sure if this is aimed partly at me, but I would hope you realise from my history on this board that I'm not just out to blame and insult Mr Hood nor is it my main priority to get him out. I do believe that it is at least time for Peter to take a long look in the mirror and ask himself if he has anything to offer as chairman anymore.

Perhaps you should look in the mirror jumping in on Pystic Eddy's own personal vendetta!

One thing to remember, he won't be pledging just sledging!