I might have remembered it wrong and if so apologies, but pretty sure that Hood now owns about 16,500 of about 17,000 (give or take, can't remember the exact numbers).

I think there are only about half a dozen shareholders in total now.

But isn't the reason we had to sell because we owed the RFL money. Not saying it wasn't a good deal for the club at that time, but we weren't told we had borrowed money.

Why did the RFL demand their money back? If they didn't demand it back so urgently, then this could have been avoided? Surely?

Something the RFL (only) would know and we (inc Mr Hood) will never know!

I did yesterday as despite at that point not being happy about it a feeling the board had got us into this by being incompetent. Statement today does make it look more like us being a victim of circumstances though. Something that looked like a good deal when the decision was made has then turned out otherwise due to a changing situation.

Has the statement today changed your mind at all? Apologies if this is being covered on another thread, I have just got home!