Like i've said previously , if i say where the info comes from then there would be no future info.
This is 100% , i don't know where our 'enquiry' will take us in terms of him becoming a bull or not but we have certainly asked his availability .
I think it could be a good move all round,
Lee couldn't get in the Leeds squad when Watkins was injured let alone fit.
The deal Lee would of signed returning from union would of been greater than his current value to the team, so leeds might be happy to reduce some wages.
He gets to play on a more regular basis
And bulls get a potential england outside back.
I would take him any day of the week over either Sykes or Platt, He has a nac of scoring in big games (if i remember rightly he got the mom in both finals prior to his union stint)

Nope!

I remember reading a contentious tweet from smithy basically ridiculing the fact that Luke burgess couldn't make the rhino's team but was ripping up trees in the NRL! I don't think tweets like this from lee's twitter account help him in the popularity stakes with Brian mc, however I don't think Brian makes his team selection personal it's just that smithy ain't got what it takes to get into the rhino's team not when the young guns are streets ahead of him

Who?

Yeah I saw that tweet and as I'm based over here I've obviously submerged myself in NRL I've seen burgess in action. Made good meters looked good in defence but in souths must win game to make the play offs he came up with errors that cost souths the game. Luke will need to sort his game out big time. He won't last five mins in a Madge team with those errors in his game.

By Lee Smiths logic when all was said and done Mac new best, Mac had the last laugh.

Agree re Luke Burgess's last game, although to be fair he didn't lose the game all on his own - Sandow and Isaac Luke were dreadful. Luke B does need to work on ball security generally (as does Sam BTW) and also cut out the 'no look' offloads, which nearly always end up with the ball on the deck.