Quote tigertot="tigertot"A few years ago, prior to you leaving nursery, trawling other teams' sites to pedal your anti-Saints bile & creating childish web sites, they did. news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/tv_and_ ... 418055.stm'" aye, he was a laughing stock on the old bulls board

Quote tigertot="tigertot"A few years ago, prior to you leaving nursery, trawling other teams' sites to pedal your anti-Saints bile & creating childish web sites, they did. news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/tv_and_ ... 418055.stm'" aye, he was a laughing stock on the old bulls board

How did Wigan get drawn into this.

It was a retort from a Saints fan who disputed the "Saints Reduction Factor" in calculations of bans.

It has been shown to be rubish. Remember the good friday brawl? Wilde holding a player while Newton waded into him. This then turns into Feunati on wilde, scully and Farrel involved too. We had a ban total of 4 or 5 games for that. Not a single wigan player got a ban. Kinda shows your theory to be as poor as the one about the world being flat.

Clearly they would have got a total of 15 matches under normal rules, then.

As for your kind offer of a reference, even if I ever needed one, no thanks. I'd prefer someone with a grasp of English to write any reference for me.

Even clearer is that the Wigan reduction factor must be even greater for three players to throw punches, including the fights first punches then get no matches.

Do you still carry a notebook to the pub with you?

I've NEVER carried a notebook to the pub. Except for a meeting when I was Chairman of the Brass Band I played for.

A "New" member harking back to Bullrage... It's like a game of "Guess Who?"

Conrad?

no, im no saints fan even though you have assumed it throughout this thread

Don't think I've referred to you as a Saints fan anywhere, although [iyou[/i did...



Whoops!

I think that everyone who was posting on that board at that time remembers your little notebook thing. Just to refresh your memory, you were obscenely bitter about Saints and felt that they

got away with a lot. You then tried to prove this by making notes when you was at a pub watching a match. The post you made was literally 3 mins 25 seconds Cunnigham high tackle with no penalty.....4mins 15 seconds, Hooper late hit on kicker no penalty etc etc.

I dont actually know what was funnier, the fact that you were sad enough to do this or the fact that you thought by writing this information down then it could no longer be biased and must be the truth. You then backtracked on this pub and notebook malarkey pretending it was all one big jape once you were (rightfully) ridiculed.

and no, you are not correct on who you think I am.

Despite the appalling use of English, I do believe Sir, you have just ridden Fishta like Seabiscuit