Paul Grayshon was a promising prop? Tub of lard more like.

I did think Craig Richards looked good to begin with but he lost it for some reason.

Scruton won't have to 'fight for his place' given he is one of the best players in the team. Terrace cliche.

We don't have the luxury of a dearth of quality forwards or anyone who is tearing it up in his absence.

When, he's back, he should be in.

And again I agree. Give me the experience of the likes of Scrutes any day. Bring the young lads on gradually.

And as should Kearney. Folk maybe have short memories? Scroll back to the early games of the season and see what we all thought of Kearney. He's not runaway leader of the RAB MOM table - despite not having played for ages - for nothing.

Yup. Kearney is a country mile the most flamboyant "go-to" man in the team. Ouzes class and time on the ball and light years ahead of others in terms of his speed of thought. That some ignore that is either amnesia or stupidity.

Heath, BK, Scruton for mine, the key players in the team. If Langley could stay on the field and avoid pseudo-surgery-talk from those close to him, he would join the list.

to be honest i think scruton has to be in the team he is probably the closest thing we have to an enforcer at the moment and things like those massive hits when he sends the opposition player landing into "row Z" of the stand can really lift the team in a funny sort of way, iv no doubt that Tom Burgess will be just as good if not better than scruton but he will just have to wait for now and be eased in instead of been told to sink or swim which has ruined players with very promising potential in the past. i also reckon there will be another prop signed for next year , bit of a south sea islander nutcase impact prop. controversial i know but thats what i think will happen!