That is what I think too, I don't reckon we will be seeing Orford in Bradford any time soon.

Well, I still haven't heard of any action brought by Harris against his lawyers. If it had actually been issued, I'd have thought there would have been big publicity, but who knows.

So far as the 500K goes, this was by no means Leeds' costs to date, it was just the costs of the preliminary issue hearing which the Bulls, to their amazement, lost. So the award of costs would only have been in respect of costs Leeds had incurred in dealing with the preliminary issue, and not of the whole case, which would therefore be a whole lot more. What they would have been by the time the case folded, I shudder to think, and whatever they were, double it, as the Bulls had a legal team too and they won't have been working for nothing either.

?? How come Bulls paid Leeds £68k for the costs of the preliminary hearing, as soon as Mr Justice Gray's Decision was released?

I don't know what the figure was. It would normally be assessed by the judge on the dya the prelim hearing was concluded, though.

I lied. It was only rl£64k.rl

So the judge basically gave Caisley a direct answer to the 64,000 dollar question, then? Except it was pounds not dollars