Quote rl crazy="rl crazy"most are signed up already.....trent hodkinson would have been very good but gone to he doggies
kimmorley or has he announced hes retiring ?
i dont think much to him but would have him for a season until we can get hold of a descetn aussie'"
I think your head is in the clouds. Just a bit.
Unless out of contract, i highly doubt we'll get any "name" from Aus.
Quote rl crazy="Mick Gledhill"If we were going to take a punt on any Championship player I would only have Kyle Briggs of Featherstone who had a blinder on Thursday in the 46-16 defeat of Halifax at Post Office Road.
He looks a super prospect although he won't come cheap.'"
He did some plastering in our house earlier this year. I don't think he'd want mega money!
Quote rl crazy="Maccbull_BigBullyBooaza"Quote rl crazy="dixie"It's alright saying names that play in NRL. It's getting them over.
Lockyer - Already on a good wage! Why would he come over? Menzies came cause Manly weren't prepared to offer him a new contract.
Anasta - Is on stupid money already.
Sandow - Young aussie half back playing first team rugby. We really ain't going to get him.
You really need someone out of contract.'"
I don't know whether Menzies was offered a contract by Manly or not but he was handsomely paid by Bulls. Don't get me wrong he was a true champion player for us and can only be thought of as a legend. However, I think the time was right to part company with him because the cash can be / has been spread over more than one player as a result. Lockyer would demand a similarly high contract as his name would ensure a large number of clubs would be after him if it became clear that Brisbane would be prepared to release him. If Orford does go with the cash already left in the salary cap and his salary (no idea what that may be but I bet it's less than the amounts reported in the press- he would still probably be the highest player at the club as Scrum Halves usually are) I'd like us to sign a 6 and a 7. Two specialists in those positions is better than one superstar and the rest of the team playing out of position to accomodate a 6 who is naturally a full back or centre.
The best outcome of course would be for Orford to stay and us to sign a specialist 6 to partner him but that is sadly looking increasingly unlikely.'"
I didn't say it was wrong to get rid of Menzies... Just the comparison that lockyer is younger than menzies and would almost certainly be demanding a much higher wage, with a lot more clubs interested. Not realistic at all.