Quote knockon="knockon"you carnt be proud of that tho can you (the clubs told im were to go ) , the way i understand it , is walker has signed a contract with bulls , one that was offered to him , it sent back and every thing kosure , but then bradford have to register there signing with the rfl , in which orford came up , so they dont send to rfl walkers registration , and try and wriggle out of the walker signing , even tho hes signed the contract offered , so bradford think it ok to do this as the rfl didnt register him ! in my eyes the player signed a contract , so only bradford to blame , this is only my opinion tho !'"
Well, you may be right. However there are several other scenarios that do not paint the Bulls in a poor light. If you'd read the thread you'd find them littered around. However before launching into your enlightened attack on the club did you actually think about...
a) the one sided notion of events as played out in the press?
b) that Walker's agent could perhaps be in the wrong (e.g. he supposedly had 2 clients signing for the Bulls: Kearney, whose deal went through without a hitch, and Walker. When he got the counter-signed contract through for Kearney you'd think that he'd get slightly nervous about Walker's wouldn't you?)
P.S. The Bulls announced Kearney had signed early on in October
before he had a visa.