how people can say ganson is against bradford is beyond me. they seemed to get alot of decisons yeaterday including 2 video ref tries that were very dodgy and the penalty try. just shows how ppor they are with these and playing a poor side IMO and still losing. very funny though

both teams defences were as dodgy as the bbcs clock

Remind me again...was Ganson the Video Ref yesterday?

I thought the first try was dodgy and I was surprised it was given, but the others looked clear-cut OK. Cats may have knocked on for the try after Platt's disaster, but even if they did it only cancelled out our first try.

So what would have been the decision if the try/foul incident had taken place in front of the posts?

A kick from the touchline.

Bradford got a penalty for the foul,hence the term 'penalty try'.So what happened to the conversion of the try ?Should have been an eight pointer.

We got a penalty try for the foul, not a penalty.

Been at the Shandies again. Your logic is astounding. 'Ganson sin't against Bradford because the video ref gave two tries'. Now look really closely and see if you can find the flaw in your argument. Go on. It's there somewhere.

The try had already been scored,he fell short because of the foul but recovered and continued over the line.What would have been the advantage to Bradford had the incident taken place beneath the posts?

None, I don't see why it was given as a penalty try to be honest.

The foul was worthy of a penalty, but we'd scored anyway, so that should have been that.

The eight point try only comes into play if the try scorer is fouled after touching the ball down.

The original kick would be in line from where the try was scored and then the second kick given from under the posts.