But he shows up quite well in rlthis comparisonrl with his old pal.

Since we're comapring "similar types of props", thought rlthisrl would be an interesting comaprison for Jammer. F*ck me, terry was a good prop - look at those yards per carry (doesn't look like he had to do as many minutes, mind).

Terry was alright but 43 missed tackles? Its no good having great attacking game if you cant tackle. (penny anyone)

O'Connor was a good player. It shows again how brilliant Graham is, his workload is amazing. O'Connor's metre per carry is impressive, but warped by the fact that he didn't do as much work as Jammer, which always makes it easier.

Fielden would stand no chance in the NRL. In the NRL the other props, like Price, Moimoi are a lot bigger compared to him.

That's not a bad stat. Only two a match which is not bad for a prop who is putting himself about a lot. It just so happens that Jammers tackle success percentage is outstanding.

So you finally agree i am right Stuart Fielden and James Graham are two different types of Prop Forward and therefore cannot really be compared with each other to an extent...

If Terry was a good prop, then Jammer is world class, he's outplayed O'Connor in almost every stat.

The stats seem to confirm this

At least we got there in the end...

Who's better, a prop that makes 500 carries for 3000m or one that make 250 carries for 2000m?

Jammer's high number of carries are somewhat forced upon him due to him normally being our only fully fit prop and playing longer minutes than other props, something that's not particulary indicitive of their ability.
Graham does have a huge work rate anyway, which is displayed when your regulary see him chase back to cover breaks and covering kicks through - that's not covered in stats.

Don't just look at the stats and say - he's better cause those numbers are higher and these are lower.

Well mate you said but i'm not sure it'll ever happen!...