And your point is? How old do you think I was when I did my VT? That worked, didnt it? If theyre good enough theyre young enough

It's not correct, and typing "and that is correct" at the end doesn't make any more so.

Leeds' four oldest players add up to a total of two years older than Saints four oldest players total years.

So, that's Saints and Leeds with four oldish players in their teams and Leeds being the slightly older. Now ask yourself this.... who are the two best teams in the superleague? Should Saints and Leeds learn from your wisdom and get rid of these older players because the succes of your team proves Saints and Leeds obviously don't know what they are doing?

You don't have to answer the questions BTW. I already know the answer. If you want to see some silver go and have a look at the trophy rooms of these old teams.

Of course it's correct, four of means exactly that. It doesn't say the four oldest or that other clubs don't have four older players it does what it says on the tin.

Just think of the SH we can get to replace long with the free cap space. It sure as hell wont be some overated muppet like Tim Smith

Don't you need to be rated before being overrated?