According to the RFL's website its on Wednesday/Thursday and covers both lots of fixtures.

any player can lift legs horizontally to make the tackle and if a second player comes in and applies pressure to the upper body physics say the legs will go above verticle. No malice or intent in the tackle from either player but the RFL will probably ban Mike despite not really doing anything wrong. Are we really gonna get to a point where a player is afraid to lifts legs incase the pressure applied to upper body from a 2nd player causes the legs to go above horizontal. There needs to be some common sense applied and intent needs to play a part in the decision The fact the legs are above horizontal does not make a tackle dangerous

no comments on how he was the best hooker on the field?

Agree with that

It sure looked like intent to me and that wasn't what happened.
He could have let go before the legs went above the "verticle".

your interpretation is different to mine then but im not gonna spend endless entries trying to change your mind. Mike did nothing wrong, Hansen's inclusion made the legs go above horizontal after Mike had lifted them to make the tackle. If thats intent maybe you should go watch wendyball. Im sure the melodramtic view would be welcomed

it wouldn't your a saints fan who had just lost to wigan and he was one the best players on the field.

McIlorum was the best hooker on the field today, and by some way.

was this tackle 2 mins after being warned about persistent penalty's ? and the ref kept his cards in his pocket

Blame the ref....... He hurt my ears with his whistle every time we scored a try....

I thought this was going to be about how Micky Mac out Robied Roby

He's not even the best 9 in the wigan side

McIlorum won't, or shouldn't be in trouble, as if you check the replay, you will see that he couldn't be 'lifting' due to when the "dirty deed" was done. His feet were off the ground !

How can you lift if your feet aren't on '[iterra firma[/i' ?

Surely that defies the laws of physics?