There is no reason why Paul can't play at another position. I don't buy this he can only play FB arguement.

The fact that he's terrible probably excludes from the other positions. Why would we want to play him? The only other positions he could play would be centre and backrow. But we've far better options in those positions. He should be dual registered, we don't need him.

Indeed. Daft as a brush.

I asked the question last week and we've now seen why he hasn't looked himself: responsibility and organisation.. He was superb today. I was never saying he was a bad player, and today showed what he is capable of.

Tbh, I wouldn't want to get carried away with today and it could still go tits up. So, I assume that's why Brown has said Wellens will play? Lets see how he's done after these next couple of tricky fixtures before saying he's our new FB.

Indeed - that seemed to me to be the point.


I doubt it. I can't see what McManus's motivation would be for insisting on Wellens being in the team, nor can I see Brown accepting such a stipulation.

I wasn't thinking of McManus.

Who then? I can't see anyone else at the club having an influence on team selection to the point where they could insist on a player playing.

Surely you must see where she is going with this?

No.

I think he does. I think he is being obtuse.

It begins with R and rhymes with bush.

Big name move to Salford?

I don't understand why he'd be able to overrule Brown on a decision like that though?