You brought Karma into the discussion. Once you infer the existence of mystical mumbo jumbo that doesn't exist to support your point of view, then you've either lost the argument you were having or didn't have a point in the first place.

I like how you call someone childish then refer to them being "OWNED"

I had some sympathy with you until I looked at the team sheets for before and after the 75-0

Fri, 10 June 2005
Wigan Warriors V Hull FC Hull 24-28 home
Wigan Warriors: Dennis Moran, Brett Dallas, Martin Aspinwall, Stephen Wild, Brian Carney,Kevin Brown, Danny Orr, Jerry Seuseu, Terry Newton, Jerome Guisset, Danny Tickle, Harrison Hansen, Liam Botham
Subs: Chris Ashton, Wayne Godwin, Bryn Hargreaves, Joel Tomkins
Sun 26 June 2005
Saints 75-0 away
Wigan Warriors: Sean Gleeson, Brett Dallas, Martin Aspinwall, Stephen Wild, Brian Carney, Kevin Brown, Dennis Moran, Jerry Seuseu, Terry Newton, Danny Sculthorpe, Danny Tickle, David Allen, Bob Beswick
Subs: Wayne Godwin, Bryn Hargreaves, Jerome Guisset, Harrison Hansen
9th July
2weeks later Warrington 36-17 home
Wigan Warriors: Chris Melling, Brett Dallas, Martin Aspinwall, David Vaealiki, Liam Colbon, Danny Orr, Dennis Moran, Jerome Guisset, Wayne Godwin, Bryn Hargreaves, David Allen, Stephen Wild, Liam Botham
Subs: Jerry Seuseu, Terry Newton, Danny Tickle, Harrison Hansen

Some positional changes but the general shape is the same. So 5/6 changes to the line up over 4 weeks, to a team, on paper that was able to win but lacked "motivation". But injury ridden well maybe not !

Your self righteous attitude is very amusing.

I think you should entertain us with your Cunningham always passes the ball forward rant or even better your Terry Newton's tackle on Sean Long was perfectly legal rant with pictures included.

Maybe Karma doesn't exist, but nevertheless you have to agree that Cunningham deserved a ban, didn't get one, and instead you lose Wellens and Roby to injury.

I didn't call on Karma to support my point of view, just point out that what has happened would be a good reason to perhaps believe that Karma DOES exist. Of course, if Karma really DID exist, then it has a long way to catch up with ALL the wrongs committed by Saints over the years.

My point that Cunningham deserved a ban but didn't get one is still completely rigid. Interesting how when this is the REAL issue, no-one is taking up the chance to debate it, instead they'll pick up on my "Karma" comment, hoping they can somehow debunk my posts, but instead looking rather silly. Thus proving that you DO actually know I'm right.

Now that I have corrected your comments, feel free to reiterate the truth as seen through your rose tinted glasses (specsaver specials) ergo no broken eye socket, no cheek bone depressed, no injury sustaining a long absence from the game equals no ban large or small.

You're great

Completely unrelated events.



Why bother to bring it up then?



It is your opinion that he should have been banned, unfortunately for your argument that doesn't make it fact whether you deem it to be 'completely rigid' or not. Given the sentencing guidelines the RFL now have, if he'd deserved a ban he'd have got one.

What you failed to take in, was that I admitted to correcting your post; therefore negating the need to confirm the same.
On the point of my parents, difficult to answer that as they are both sadly no longer with us, but I suspect that they were proud.
Finally, you are entitled to your opinion of the incident and have made that clear, but the RFL didn't see it your way, so pick another subject and lets await the next chapter in your crusade for justice, wigan style.

Hear you could be without Gardner this weekend, with a bug