Which would suggest that the £200k Warrington have spent on Myler is not that bad a deal.

No doubt there will be plenty that will say Tomkins and Eastmond are the better prospects however Myler's stats stand-up to comparison against either of those and the England coach certainly considered Myler the better option. In fact at the age Myler is now Tomkins had yet to play a single Super League match.

So if Wigan fans wouldn't sell Tomkins for £250k and no doubt Saints fans would say the same with Eastmond I can't see how Warrington can be considered to have overspent at £200k for Myler.

Oh signing Myler is a good deal for Warrington. It all depends on if you have the money to spend and Saints (along with most other clubs) probably don't have the money. Only time will tell if he is better/worse than Tompkins and Eastmond.

Either way it is a good bit of business from Warrington.

It took him Wembley.

I believe Radlinski admitted in his book he did get paid.

Expeneses and he's still owed some.

So I gather...great way to treat a club "legend". How much were his expenses?

ten and six

Hundreds or thousands?