Considering Burns has a history and Meli doesn't I think it's obvious which tackle was deliberate and which one not, especially considering Burns got a long ban for a deliberate high tackle

Yes of course, didn't you know? Even our injured players don't matter cause all we need is a 7!...

What difference does history make ?
Burns has been banned, twice , and correctly i might add.
But it is the offence , not the player.
Meli set out to deliberately attack Hall's head , but thats ok because its the first time he has been caught.
Deary me.

Yea thought that would be It.
Another one eyed [ipr1ck.[/i

See my above post.

resorting to insults proves only one thing.

All of that makes you even more stupid with your comments. If you cant spot or tell the difference between a desperate clumsy action and a dirty deliberate challenge (raised elbows etc) then you need to get a grip.

It's not insulting to say your clueless , at least not when its true. I can tell the difference between a dirty player and a clumsy player who made a mistake unless there a KR player I'm assuming you cant.

No we need a 6 as well. We also need to replace 2 props for next year but I'd settle for a 6 & 7 this year as I suspect that would put us back in the mix for a GF spot.

Not going to happen though

No we need a 6 as well. We also need to replace 2 props for next year but I'd settle for a 6 & 7 this year as I suspect that would put us back in the mix for a GF spot.

Not going to happen though

Well this is going nowhere

Desperate and silly, the pressure had been building on him with all the success they'd been having down the channels inside him, culminating in a massive brain explosion.