Which of Burrow's two glorious tries do you mean? Was it his first where he changed direction ducked under the first line then shimmied around the fullback leaving him for dead and outpaced the cover or was it his second where he fainted around the first line then dummied to again out pace the cover?

But he does have a point to a degree.
The saints fan he was replying to was rather full of himself/yourselves.

Been watching the game, I think our half backs come out of the game with some real credit. I know you say without the aid of penalties Pete. But actually it was not all penalties. Alot of that territory came from very good kicking, there were penalties, no doubt about it. But we also gained territory by good kicking and kick pressure. Drop outs and the like. TP and Sia also made some decent carries.

If it had not been for our kicking game, then the score would have been alot worse as we would not have had the territory to score those tries. I have to concur that our forwards either don't have the bulk to move the line or are not applying themselves to more the line. Jammer was good at hitting the line getting his head through and then getting the quick play the ball.

Some drives after initally hitting the line, the player was driven backwards. The thing is we have seen all these players drive the ball before and be more effective. Also Jammer did not cover the whole defensive line and make every tackle so they know how to do these jobs as they did them last season. Yes with Jammer leading the way, but he was not doing it on his own.

We did kick a lot in the first half and even roby was kicking from the play the ball. I even said to a make that Royce looks to have a game plan and tactics which shocked me.

We couldn't get the ball in second half to carry on with that but also didn't change tactic s to adapt to the game that went in the French favour.

It's my instinct that it is our forwards who are letting the team down both in attack and defence. I think they are lazy because if you watch their legs in attack, more often than not they are not pushing. In defence they are not moving along to provide cover on the line and there were some shocking one on one misses on Friday night. Simmons has a job on his hands to get them working as a pack, as opposed to waiting for Jammer to take the first hit or save the day in defence.

Our kicking game close to the line was quite good. But our [ikicking for distance[/i was flat out atrocious. How many times did Gaskell split the full back and wingers? How many times did he turn either around? It was like a return to the days of limp-legged Long with the ball spiralling neatly into the hands of wingers who didn't need to move so much as an inch from their assigned positions.

I'm all for going easy on the kids. But we have to remember the other team has no intentions of doing the same. If Gaskell lacks the experience and/or ability on the 5th tackle to move the team forward 40m the opposition isn't going to take pity on him and toss the ball backwards.

Spot on. I lost count of the kicks that went straight to the defence, and yet people say we need him for his kicking game.

But Gaskell did not kick all the balls. This is what gets me, when you look at the kicks going direct into peoples paws, how many came from Gaskell????

I'm yet to see the full game and maybe the 2nd half is a different kettle of fish, but in the first half the kicks that went to hand, tended to come from Lomax, Roby et al.

Exactly. We had Wilkin (I think he did most of the long kicking didn't he?), Roby, Lomax and Gaskell all kicking at various times. I do know that one of Gaskell's kicks was a splitter but I've yet to watch the game back to see who was responsible for the other kicks.

Gaskell kicked an absolute pearler of a grubber to grab a try. He is really coming on in his short kicking game. Makes me drool - in a rugby league context only! - to think what he is going to be like if he continues to develop all these facets of his game.

Bang on,Gaskell hardly kicked early on,so much so that I commented he must have been playing with a leg injury.

Which indeed he did have and was why he didn't play at Hull KR.

He can't have had a leg injury as according to you, Royce won't pick anyone who's injured, even if it's a bruise to small finger.

The more I read and hear about this fella the more and more makes me think that the Royce Simmons on twitter is really him.

#totalmess

He had an injury. He got over the injury. By the time he was over the injury he hadnt got much time to practice before the game so he was rusty.