So it looks as though I was correct.

The disciplinary committee is a joke. We've benefitted in the past in days when we used to reach finals.

Contact is shoulder to shoulder? Clearly not.

Because the disciplinary agrees?! Love it.

Bet you've never disagreed with a disciplinary decision ever.

Can't comment on the Taylor tackle, not seen it. The Ady Gardner tackle at Hull KR (for which he was put on report & missed 1 match) ended Kris Welhams season in April. At least O'Brien doesn't appear seriously injured.

No because this was my previous post.



And you'll find that is my stance with all these types of incidents.

Well we'll well NO case to answer

There was contact with the head, as shown by that picture. So how can they say otherwise. It's a joke, the whole system has been this season for us.

Adam Swift is tackled by someone's knee = out for a couple of weeks and they guy is found guilty and then on appeal is found not guilty?!

Flanagan cannonball tackle = out for the season and not guilty

Was we expecting any different really?

Hardly surprising with your cup semi final coming up.

well if you think that tackle is'nt worthy of a ban you are deluded

It just shows how stupid and inconsistent they are. Gardner got a ban for less. RFL in wigoons pocket as normal.

The picture should be sent to the RFL and ask them to explain their decision. It seems only Saints players are used as testing when these new rules are brought in.

Yep, we called in all our favours for this one. After all, without Taylor we would definitely lose against the London Broncos.