Wakefield have TV adverts as well, it's nothing to shout about. It's cheaper for Wigan though as they don't have TVs there.

Wakefield are so high rolling they do their adverts for away games that they get very little revenue from.

And what would you know about marketing?

Good girl.

Perhaps its because we don't indulge in the sort of practices that interest HMRC.
IF we were under HMRC investigation then our auditors would have to make us acknowledge it in our accounts or they wouldn't sign them off.
Wigan's accounts confirm HMRC enquiries ours don't.
End of.

Correctamundo.

We'll see

I'm sure we will. There is no way the accounting report would have been allowed to get signed off without acknowledgement of the HMRC investigation.

I'm not entirely sure and it sounds like saint at wire would be able to elaborate but I think this in itself is an offence if it was to occur?

Warrington didn't do it last year, but have this.

I'd imagine they probably got a royal slap on the wrist for it then if they was being investigated at the time.

I'm not an expert on company law but yes it is an offence under Section 418 of the Companies Act 2006 for any Director to not disclose "relevant audit information" to the auditors i.e. this type of thing. Our Auditors are Baker Tilly the 8th largest UK audit company so would not put up with any "funny business" or messing about from directors.
It is also a requirement thar each director ensures that he/she has taken all steps possible to find out about any such shenagans.

It sounds a bit obvious, but perhaps in 2008/09 they were not under investigation but in 2009/10 they were?