Name them.

I think Armstrong being dual registered with Leigh could really bring him on (hopefully), so that's one young centre, Foster's technically a centre by choice, Wheeler is a good choice at centre when fit and there's the young lad Tommy Makinson as well, so if Badbury was behind all of those then he wasn't going to get much of a look in at centre.
Hopefully we'll fill our centre position with one of those, or a marquee signing, but I hope Badbury does kick on at Oldham and win a SL contract. Now that the quota's tightening there should be more scope for guys like this that don't make it at their first club. Good luck to him.

Regarding the resigning of |Meli and Flanders, as I said at the time, they were pretty uninspiring news flashes, but not awful moves squad wise.
Obviously now I wish that we'd let one of them go because I'd like to sign Monaghan. If only we could of predicted he'd be available

I'd be quite happy a loosing Ned Flanders to be honest.

But Meli doesn't count, does he? He signed before the 2007 deadline that I was reading about the other day so we could in theory have another overseas player. If we had room under the cap.

I was thinking more from a wage/salary cap POV.

I have to admit I am not very happy about us resigning Flannery and Meli when we should be promoting from within. Players like Armstrong, Wheeler, Lomax and Maggenis need to be given more time if the first team this year otherwise we are going to lose more young players.

The club does not seem to be looking long term enough at the moment.

Not by me. I've been consistently in favour of developing our young players rather than bring in antipodean journeymen or resigning elderly has-beens. Obviously a balance has to be struck between youth and experience but I think letting go of young backline players is foolish of Saints especially when one of them hasn't even had the chance to show what he has at first grade level and yet is playing in a position we are crying out for talent to fill.

I do hope the club isn't going backwards and that Royce will be strong enough to drop our elderly has beens in favour of a conscious policy of providing an opportunity to our potential talent in the backline. We sure do need it.

How much U21 rugby do you watch to make that kind of comment? If you've seen a lot of him fair enough, but if you haven't, why do you think he should get that chance?

Did he show enough to be given that first team opportunity? Perhaps his games in the U21s showed enough weaknesses to not be considered for the next level up. He's certainly not a name that has been put forward by people I know to be regular U21 watchers as a potentially great player. And whilst some players develop at later ages, we've not made many, if any, mistakes in which young players we have released in the last 10 or so years.

Over a period of time like 10 years it's difficult to quantify the players as some have been replaced and then the replacements have been replaced or not in some cases.

e.g Iro -> Gleeson (Many would have said this was a major step down at the time) -> Lyon -> Gidley -> Shenton

on the other hand have we every replaced Scully? Long and it took over a year to replace Talau with a second row (wearing the number 4 shirt)

As I said, Armstrong, Foster, Wheeler are all guys that can play centre and have had first team chances, plus Makinson is highly rated. We also have Lomax and Gaskell who will fill in for other positions in the backs.

We can't keep them all, and if its the best thing for Bradbury to move on, then the club shouldn't stand in the way if he's not in their plans. If we started tying down youngsters and then not releasing them even if we didn't need them, there'd be a lot more discontent in the camp i'm sure.

Agreed.

We've a number of young players who possibly have 10 years ahead of them in the game that have shown that they will go on to become, at the very least, competent SL standard players. Younger kids are going to have to show something extra to displace them in the squad.

Exactly, whether Bradbury ends up in SL or just has a decent career for oldham, it shows young lads at Saints that even if they don't make the SL grade for saints, its not the end of their career. If saints look after them and help find them a club that suit their level, then it will a) give the youngsters the confidence that the club will do the best by them, thus keeping player morale high and b)forge relationships with NL clubs that could come in handy if they have any young stars who should make the step up to SL.