Given how poor Wellens has been and how horrific the half backs have been, it's ridiculous that they've not even tried him there. He'd contribute a hell of a lot more in attack than Wellens and probably defensively too, his pace would get him to balls and tackles Wellens would just arrive at when they are being scored, an example being Hohaia chasing back for the tackle against Warrington when Wellens was huffing and puffing and being passed by the props.

We would have to put up with a few dropped high balls and the odd absolute clanger, something a lot of Saints fans seem to judge as the most important aspect of the game.

That wasn't the world cup. Beating an understrength Kiwis side in a test series or the Aussies here and there isn't the same as being a world cup winner. Wello was dismal in the world cup I watched (as were his team mates!).

I've no idea whether Anthony Stewart ever played for GB/England (before my time) but a player doesn't get to win a world cup without being extremely good in his position, whichever position that might be. The reason why we are tosh at international level is because we don't have that level of player throughout our team.

Sorry to be a bore but that isnt strictly true - my memory is that there was Brent Webb and Lance Hohaia who were the only players with any kind of experience at Full Back - I cannot remember why webb wasnt chosen (I think it was either Injury or the fact he played in the UK) but it didnt leave a lot of choice to pick from.

What the Kiwis had was a pack that were fed on raw meat for a week before the game and smashed the Ozzy pack - plus a master stroke of playing Thomas Leuluai at hooker with Isaac Luke as backup (Hooker has historically always been the Kiwis weak spot but this turned it around for them) to allow Benji Marshall to play his best game at international level that I can recall. Remember that earlier in the tournament the Kiwis were battered by Australia 30 - 6 with a team that didnt have those changes in it.

I'm not saying it is. You said that Wello had never done it against the Aussies. I was just pointing out that he was part of a full strength GB team who beat Australia in their own back yard. In their prime. He scored a try in the process and was excellent all game. As excellent as Hohaia was 4 years ago when he was full back for NZ against Australia in the World cup final. Neither of these games has any significance whatsoever as to who should be playing full back for Saints now though and to keep shaking the "world cup winning fullback" stick is pointless in 2012.



Not often no. It doesn't automatically qualify him to be the best option at full back for Saints, 2 knee operations and 4 years later though.

The point I made about Anthony Stewart was to say that a team can win anything even with an average player in their side. Who did Spain have up front when they clinched the European Championship this year? The most ridiculed striker in World football, Fernando Torres. Ricky Bibey won Challenge cup medals with Wigan and Saints, likewise Steve Hall won every domestic medal available with Saints.

IF we had to move Wello from full back, and I'm not advocating that we should just stick with Wello if something better comes along, then I'd rather Lee Gaskell played there. I'd love to see him hitting the line with his rangey running style. Think he'd be a revelation there if he was up to the defensive aspect of the job.

Hohaia would be no upgrade on Wellens. I'm sure he's better than Wello at the odd thing a full back would do but overall Wellens is still a much better option. Trying to shoehorn Hohaia into a role because he isn't cutting the mustard in the role he was signed to play isn't particularly fair on Wello.

I know Wello has his limitations. There are other options at Saints as well to replace him in Gaskell, Swift and Makinson. Hohaia wouldn't even be in my thinking.

I thought the topic was swift but here we go again with Wello bashing.

Fact is, Wellens has been one of our better players this season (I think he is top try scorer as well) but some think he is not worth his place. If Wellens should be dropped then 75% of the team should be given a free transfer because I'm sorry, they are just not good enough.

Some fans can't see the wood for the trees though. They see fall over the line tries being scored as a player contributing well to the attack and they see a player not dropping bombs or knocking on as a player being good defensively.

In reality Wello is at that stage of his career where most of the game just passes him by as he's not able to keep up or get into the right position. He's no more than solid now and is definitely holding us back.

I'm defending Wello.

Well if he can play prop, second, row, wing, centre of half back as well as any of those he's welcome to move there. What is it that's stopping you from seeing the issues he has that contribute to the overall effectiveness of our attacking gameplan? Why can you not see them?

Perhaps he isn't blind to the fact that our problems are more to do with pedestrian ball from poor halves than who is on the end of it?

Or the slow, poor distribution from dummy half?