I wonder who Phil Clarke wanted to win?

We deserved at least one point from that game for the comeback. should have had two though. Pity about the missed conversion.

And his litle leprchaun friend. They were both banging the glass of their little booth crying about every decision that didn't go Hull's way. They, however, ignore the diagonal passes.

Give over. Washbrook cleary is going for the ball, hence him not taking his eyes of it and him jumping in the air with his hands up.

You probably deserved a point in the end anyway. But to say it was the correct decision is very foolish.

Still doesnt make up for the 3 forwards passes he called against us and the 3 that he didn't call against hull that led to 2 tries and 1 near try.

It's the Steve Ganson show.

Jes never heard clark and Carney so baised before.

They just did not want anything to go for Saints. Every call they were against Saints. There was no way Foster knocked the ball forwards he had it in his hand till the hull player dragged it out and they were calling for a knock on. Then Nathan ash gets taken out in the air.

If that had been carney we would have seen 6 forward rolls and a cartwheel to emphasis the point, but as it's a saints lad, oh no he was going for the ball.

Awesome once again from the lads. They really showed their metal. Joint top with that team. Just wait till we get ourselves a few players back.

No way a penalty, can't challenge for a high ball now?

Balls, you just wanted Hull to win. For a challenge in the air to not be penalised you have to challenge for the ball. He's nowhere near it.

It's a 50-50 call, but Washbrook isn't helped by the little nudge Roby gives him. If he doesn't get a nudge, he gets closer to the ball.

I will try and not talk about Ganson.

But instead focus on what was a fantastic game of rugby, two teams that went for it and really wanted to win and play rugby.

A amazing kicking game in the 20 minute spell after halftime and massive games from Wilkin and Roby.

seemed a great atmosphere.

Good luck with the rest of the season.

so many flamers coming on and raging ffs the decisions levelled themselves out and a draw was a fair reflection of the game

Look at it again, ball came off washbrook and went forward to houghton who was off side anyway. Regardless of washbrooks challenge, it was a penalty in any event.

Apart from being directly under it? You're saying a playing can jump up like that flail about aimlessly miss it and because someone touches him its a penalty? Washbrook only made contact after the ball was through the Saints players hands.

Its a joke.

Exactly. He impacts Ashe in the air in the legs and it's his hands striking at the ball that knock it forward. Either way it's 24 all.