Knee ligaments for Lomax and I'd say ankle for Percival. He seemed to have the foot in a protective boot and nothing on the knee when he hobbled across the pitch didn't he?

Roby was carrying an injury and has been for some time I believe. Hohaia had to move there and Roby looked like he was defending in the HB position

But why did he wait so long to bring him on?

I think I heard Ray French said twisted ankle for Percival, don,t know about Lomax. Looks as though Dawson and Jones is in for next week, maybe Swift or Makinson or Wellens at full back.

As I said 2 days agoI am told by a sponsor that when they asked that was the reply from the management i.e. "out of favour" and he will not get a new deal.

Personally I'd prefer to see him in the halves over Wilkin but this is what I was told.
'"

Roby was carrying that arm for the last 20 mins against Cas last week.

I was told he is struggling with his hand/wrist. Don't know how true that is though.

Cunningham nearly let it slip in the interview at the end too! Managed to stop himself

Its after this inglorious win and a good 2 points after which that the coach has to really earn his coin with these injuries.

Good job it was Wakey, christ they were awful

Incorrect.

He was in the vicinity of the Wakey player attempting to catch it. Regardless of whether the Wakey player actually caught it or touched it, Turner's close presence is deemed to have effected play/player.

Yes, I must admit I thought we were a little lucky with that one.

Marginal call. It only the boot of the kick he has to be level with. I'd have given it offside on first viewing. Butt. In footy they can draw lines across. Maybe we should do the same. Clear it up a bit.

I thought the Turner try decision was fair. It's true you have to be further than ten metres from the receiver when he touches it, if you start from an offside position. However, that's ten metres in a circle with the centre of that circle being the receiving player. In other words, the offside player must be at least ten metres in any direction. So when a man collects the ball, as soon as he's run 10m in any direction -sideways and backwards too - he is onside and can be tackled.

So Turner didn't have to be 10m further down the pitch. He just had to be 10m away from the catcher. As he was off to one side, the distance between him and the catcher was greater than 10m. Hence he was not penalised for offside even though he'd started in front of the kicker.

Then, of course, the wakey player touched the ball and lost possession, at which point everyone is instantly inside no matter where they started from.

It was strange with lance. But hey we won and burns will be back to steady the ship.

I've been one of the few thats stood up for lance in his stint here but last night he was poor. We lost all direction when he went to 9. He looked like a player that didn't know our plays at all which I know isht true. He was passing to wrong players, went wrong side , threw some murder balls and even passed to greenwood on 5th!

I understand he will be rusty but looked totally lost last night.