What exactly about the tackle has he been banned for. Keeping his arms low? Ball and all tackle? Not Wrapping his legs around the legs of the other player?

This is rediculous, I could pick out several tackles by Saints players that were far worse than this one. I could probably watch again and find worse tackles by Moore.

Again we get a decison based on outcome rather than the tackle itself. I'm off to the RFL to see the ajudication. ps Moore you need a better brief man.

In the next set of six Jones-Buchanan does exactly the same tackle.

Not on the site yet.

Just the accusation.

Refer to Tribunal Law: 15.1(a) Detail: Dangerous Contact – Defender uses any part of his body forcefully to twist, bend or otherwise apply pressure to the limb or limbs of an opposing player in a way that involves an unacceptable risk of injury to that player Grade: B


So basically Sinfields leg bent, and the part of Moore body used to do this??


It was his cock.


Well his groin area anyway.


If they say he diliberately bent Sinfields legs with his cock and balls, that would be about as daft as it sounds.

Rediculous

To be honest I cannot see why he has been pinged for it. As stated there are far worse tackles that go on.

Agreed

Regards

Jeff Lima

All his representatives need to do is take a video along with around 50% of the tackles from that game, and ask what is different from the one they have cited besides the fact that the tackled player hobbles to his feet.

watch out for a clampdown on that type of tackle (Ninja) and chicken wing. It'll happen very soon.

I saw plenty of incidents of behaviour in a manner contrary to the spirit of the game. Wonder why these weren't noticed?

The world of twitter does not really allow anyone to delete, once it is in the public arena that is it, these young lads need to learn and plenty of others at clubs to keep shut!

Will be surprised if an appeal works!

The lad just needs a better brief, who ever was argueing his case must have been working pro-bono.

alecat21 scott moore
that went wel!! notttttt!!!

looks like appeal was turned down

Still think he shouldn't have appealed, just took it and the £300 wads as he calls it??