Good God no!

Bit older than you perhaps , with a lot more sense, and far more reasoning powers.

As stated before, youve just got it in for him. Take a step back and look again. Take the blinkers off. He is one of our best players.And you know it.

Scott Grix is a reasonable player but you would want to sign a player like him as a young man. Jordan Turner, for example, is still a young man and can be coached into being a better player. Thus, on the face of it, a good signing.

Grix also has that utility label, which he would want to get rid of. You would be hard pushed to say which one position he was good enough to make his own.

In the end if we sign old men then they need to be tried and tested at the highest level in his established position. This is why people had a problem with Hohaia being signed as a stand off/scrum half.

Wellens over Grix: yesterday....today.....tomorrow

Somebody said that just being a safe and defensive full back means we are missing out on the modern, attacking fullback. Wigan are missing out on a Challenge Cup Final.

Erm, so are we

You know what I meant.

Also note Grix's one on one attempt on Meli in the first half tonight and then Wellens one on one with the Giants forward in the second half.

Wello's defence was excellent tonight, twice he saved almost certain breakaway tries from being scored

Grix is a decent utility player, nothing more. Saints are a bit above his standard and he couldn't lace Wellens boots simple as that.

Looks to me as if a certain someone here has been trying to get a re-tweet off Pauly and has been mugged off!